...
The 2025 Projectathon is dedicated to supporting eReferral implementation projects across Canada. Testing will focus on validating that the vendor systems have the capabilities needed to securely exchange well-formed Patient Summary eReferral information with other systems. Vendors will have an opportunity to test and demonstrate these capabilities in two distinct areas facets of the PS- CA:eReC specification:
- CA:eReC Exchange transactions - ensuring that the system(s) can securely exchange eReferral messages using the recommended FHIR messaging exchange methods as presented in the Messaging section.
- CA:eReC Message format and content – ensuring that eReferral messages are structured in the expected format and that it contains the required information using the correct data types and valuesets, where specific valuesets are defined as required in the pan-Canadian eReferral-eConsult specifications (CA:eReC v1.0.23-DFT).
1. CA:eReC Exchange
...
Transactions
This area of testing will focus on validating the recommended exchange methods of eReferral FHIR messages as presented in the Messaging section (CA:eReC v1.0.3 DFT) of the pan-Canadian.
Testing the Secure, Exchange Transactions
Testing supports for eReferral secure, exchange transactions will be provided using a combination of test cases and tools (see Table Test Cases below for more information).
...
2. CA:eReC
...
Message Format and Content
There will be a set of test cases Test cases are focused on ensuring that the Patient Summary document is eReferral messages are structured in the expected format and that it contains the required information using the correct data types and valuesets, where specific valuesets are defined as required in the PS- CA:eReC.
In addition to testing the PS-CACA:eReC structure definitions and value sets, test cases will validate the harmonized provincial Patient Summary eReferral specifications from Ontario (PS-ON) and Alberta (PS-ABON eReC) which are very closely aligned to the PS-CA, and from New Brunswick (PS-CA:NB) and British Columbia (PS-CA:BC) which have adopted the PS-CA FHIR profilesCA:eReC. All should be supported by minimal configuration of capability in the vendor systems. The test cases will ensure that the Patient Summary eReferral is formatted and contains the required content according to the respective Jurisdiction Implementation Guide (IG), where applicable. Vendors will need to prepare to validate PT data against both PS- CA:eReC and PT Implementation Guides.
The test cases will highlight where configuration is needed and test that the configuration is applied properly, based on claimed vendor conformance.
Testing the
...
Message Format and Content
Testing supports for the Patient Summary document eReferral message format and content validation will be provided using a combination of test cases, test data sets, and tools (see table Test Cases for Document Format and Content below below for more information). While test cases reside in Gazelle, they may refer todata sets which will be available on the Test Data Sets page. The data sets will be available in an Excel spreadsheet format.
2. PS-CA Secure, Exchange Transactions
This area of testing will focus on validating the recommended secure exchange methods of the FHIR summary document as presented in the Reference Architecture (RA v0.2.0 DFT-Ballot), referenced by the PS-CA and CA:FeX specifications. Under ideal conditions, depending on the number of participating vendors and their system capabilities, tests will offer a high degree of coverage for all profiles.
Implementation patterns of these integration profiles may differ from jurisdiction to jurisdiction and information exchange channels may vary in terms of their security footprint. Therefore, the Projectathon test cases have been organized into two categories:
...
Test
...
Testing the Secure, Exchange Transactions
Testing supports for the Patient Summary secure, exchange transactions will be provided using a combination of test cases and tools (see Table Test Cases for Secure, Exchange Transactions below for more information).
Test Cases Overview
The purpose of this overview is to provide an understanding of:
- What will be tested:
- integration profiles included in the test cases
- descriptions and purpose of test cases
- actors and transactions involved in the test cases
- types of test cases and supporting tools
- Where to find the test cases
- When to run the test cases
What will be Tested (Implementation Guides
...
)
The following table describes Implementation Guides being tested, purpose of each, profiles involved and types of tests and supporting tools. To learn more about the IHE Profiles, be sure to watch the information videos included in the Description sections.
The test cases are designed to validate the interoperability capabilities of the system under test in exchanging eReferrals. Each test case typically defines a specific transaction or action that must be validated between two systems or actors. It includes detailed prerequisites, expected disruptions, involved actors, step-by-step instructions, and any supporting tools required for testing. FHIR message format and content are validated for each transaction. To explore and execute these test cases, please access Gazelle, where you can find the full set of test cases categorized by interoperability profile, actor, and transaction.
Test CasesTest Cases for Document Format and Content | |||
By IG | IG Description and Purpose of Test Cases | IHE Integration Profiles and Actors Involved | Test Case Peer Type & Supporting Tools* |
CA:eReC | The Projectathon 2025 will focus on interoperability demonstrations based on the pan-Canadian Patient Summary (PS-CA v2eReferral/eConsult Interoperability Specification (CA:eReC v1.0.0 DFT-Ballot) and the associated pan-Canadian FHIR Exchange (CA:FeX v2.1.0 DFT-Ballot) specifications. The PS-CA 3-DFT). The CA:eReC specification defines the building blocks to create and share patient summaries, send and receive eReferrals/eConsults. The purpose of testing CA:eReC is to ensure systems have the ability to create, send and receive FHIR messages (e.g., ServiceRequest MessageBundles) over the internet. These test cases for the PS-CA will also ensure that the Patient Summary is eReferrals are formatted and contains contain the required content according to the PS- CA:eReC Implementation Guide. A PS- CA:eReC clinical data set will be provided to support these test cases. Refer to the Test Data Sets for more details. To read more about the PS- CA:eReC, go go here. |
| No-Peer (PS-CA RendererGazelle platform, FHIR Validator, CA:FeX Simulators, and MHD eReC Simulators) Peer-to-Peer (Gazelle platform, FHIR Validator) |
PS-CA:BC | The PS-CA: BC Patient Summary Project has been endorsed by Canada Health Infoway and BC Provincial Digital Health as a key strategy to support patient information sharing across care settings. PS-CA: BC Implementation Guide leverages foundational artifacts from PS-CA, including BC-specific guidance tailored to provincial healthcare needs. For Release 1, national artifacts are utilized, with the potential to build on PS-CA profiles for BC-specific needs in future releases. Since the PS-CA is based on the IPS, provinces and territories can configure their building blocks to address variances and ensure alignment with the IPS specification. British Columbia has committed to aligning as close as possible with the Patient Summary sharing work with the PS-CA. The BC Patient Summary Project has focused on an initial Release that meets the minimum requirements as outlined by clinicians. BC Providers in community/clinic settings have not historically shared information digitally outside of their settings. As a result, the BC requirements are expected to evolve as clinicians become more comfortable with sharing of information and of the clinician requirements of a Patient Summary. To read more about the PS-CA:BC, go here. |
| No-Peer (PS-CA Renderer, FHIR Validator, CA:FeX Simulators, and MHD Simulators) Peer-to-Peer (Gazelle platform) |
PS-ON | The Ontario Patient Summary is based on the International Patient Summary standard and was developed in collaboration with Canada Health Infoway and other jurisdictions and with preliminary input from primary care clinicians and solution vendors. The Ontario Patient Summary (PS-ON) Standard aligns, where applicable, to the International Patient Summary (IPS) HL7 FHIR standard, the Pan-Canadian Patient Summary (PS-CA) Standard (under concurrent development), and the Canadian Baseline (CA-Baseline). To read more about the PS-ON, go here. |
| No-Peer (PS-CA Renderer, FHIR Validator, CA:FeX Simulators, and MHD Simulators) Peer-to-Peer (Gazelle platform) |
PS-CA:NB | The PS-CA:NB implementation has adopted the PS-CA FHIR profiles without creating a separate implementation guide. The initial NB Patient Summary release focuses on requirements outlined by NB clinicians, a subset of data from MyHealth Records, and the Patient Mediated Access use case using the CA:SHL profile. To read more about the PS-CA:NB implementation, go here |
| No-Peer (PS-CA Renderer, FHIR Validator, CA:FeX Simulators, and MHD Simulators) Peer-to-Peer (Gazelle platform) |
PS-AB | The Alberta Patient Summary (PS-AB) is based on the the Pan-Canadian Patient Summary (PS-CA) Standard, and the Canadian Baseline (CA-Baseline). It was developed in collaboration with Canada Health Infoway and with input from Alberta clinicians and solution vendors. The PS-AB attempts to profile in a way that allows the patient summary instances to be conformant to PS-CA, and CA-Baseline without having to formally derive from the profiles in these specifications. To read more about the PS-AB, go here. | Coming soon | Coming soon |
*To learn more about the Supporting Tools, go here.
The table below describes the integration profiles being tested, purpose of each, actors involved and types of tests and supporting tools.
The Test Cases for Secure Exchange Transactions are designed to validate the interoperability capabilities of the system under test in securely exchanging a Patient Summary. Each test case typically defines a specific transaction or action that must be validated between two systems or actors. It includes detailed prerequisites, expected disruptions, involved actors, step-by-step instructions, and any supporting tools required for testing. To explore and execute these test cases, please access Gazelle, where you can find the full set of test cases categorized by interoperability profile, actor, and transaction.
ON eReC | The Ontario eReferral/eConsult FHIR Implementation guide v0.12.0 Draft uses CA:eReC as the FHIR resource profile baseline and was developed in collaboration with the FHIR Implementers community, solution vendors and Canada Health Infoway. The specification has an open review in progress and potential for changes is possible until March 2025. These test cases will ensure that eReferrals contain the additional required message content, valuesets and bindings according to the ON eReC implementation guide. An ON eReC clinical data set will be provided to support these test cases. Refer to the Test Data Sets for more details. To read more about the ON eReC, go here. |
| No-Peer (Gazelle platform, FHIR Validator, CA:eReC Simulators |
Test Cases for Secure, Exchange Transactions
By Interoperability Profile
Profile Description and Purpose of Test Cases
Actors Involved
Test Case Peer Type & Supporting Tools*
CA:eReC
The pan-Canadian FHIR Exchange (CA:FeX) is an implementable, testable interoperability specification based on HL7 FHIR Implementation Guides, that defines building blocks to enable creating, consuming and sharing clinical data via FHIR RESTful exchange patterns.
The purpose of testing CA:FeX is to ensure systems have the ability to create, search and retrieve FHIR documents (e.g., Patient Summary) over the internet in a secure manner.
To read more technical information about CA:FeX, go here.
- Data Source
- Data Consumer
- Data Recipient
- Data Responder
) Peer-to-Peer (Gazelle platform, FHIR Validator) |
*To learn more about the Supporting Tools, go here.
...