Release TitleCA Core+ v1.0.0 DFT-preBallot
Release Date

 

Release Type Draft
Open Review PeriodTBD
Published Content

CA Core+ v1.0.0 DFT-preBallot FHIR Implementation Guide on Simplifier.net

Download Specifications (PDF)

N/A



How to Provide Feedback: 

This release, CA Core+ v1.0.0 DFT-PreBallot, has been published to support early stakeholder engagement, feedback, and implementation planning. This version aligns with Canadian Core Data for Interoperability (CACDI) Version 1, released March 2025. Stakeholders are encouraged to use this version between April and September 2025, and contribute feedback as part of the open review period, which runs from April 1 to September 29, 2025.

In the meantime, If you have feedback on the CA Core+ v1.0.0 DFT-Ballot, to be considered for a future release, you can now submit your feedback via Jira as defined below;

  • To submit feedback, you must register as a user on Infoway’s InfoCentral, be an active member of a working group, and be granted access to the JIRA projects.
  • To register on the InfoCentral website, go to: https://infocentral.infoway-inforoute.ca. Click on the Register link and follow the instructions to create an account.
  • Once registered in InfoCentral, you can request access to Jira directly in a working group meeting, or by emailing [email protected].
  • To access Jira, go to: https://informs.infoway-inforoute.ca (Note: this link will only work if you have been granted access to JIRA).
  • Submit your feedback on Jira. You will receive automatic notifications when your submissions receive comments or reach milestones during the review process.
  • All collaborators are encouraged to browse through previously submitted feedback to see if a topic has already been discussed.

Release Notes


CA Core+ v1.0.0 DFT-Ballot Release Notes

  • CA Core+ reflects the constraints of draft CACDI (Canadian Core for Data Interoperability) Version 1 (March 2025 release) rather than the constraints of the entire Pan-Canadian Health Data Content Framework
  • Updated based on 
    • Preliminary feedback from jurisdictions and working groups
    • Gaps identified through alignment reviews between existing implementation guides and CACDI
    • Alignment with early high-priority use cases, such as referrals, summaries, and provider directories
  • See Change Log page in the IGuide for further details and additional changes